
A large carbonaceous chondrite that disintegrated and fell in fragments near the French
town of Orgueil on May 14, 1864. About 20 pieces, totaling about 12 kg in mass,
were subsequently recovered from an area of several square km, some head-sized
but most smaller than a fist. Specimens could be cut with a knife and, when
sharpened, could be used like a pencil. One specimen was immediately examined
by the French scientist S. Cloëz, who commented that its content "would
seem to indicate the existence of organized substances in celestial
bodies." Subsequently, several eminent chemists of the time, including
Gabriel-Auguste Dubrée and Marcellin Berthelot,
analyzed samples and confirmed the existence of organic
materials in the rock. Coming at the same time as Pasteur's
famous announcement that he had experimentally disproven the theory of
spontaneous generation on Earth, these findings prompted a scientific debate
about whether such generation might be possible in space. Pasteur himself
examined the Orgueil meteorite, as recounted by Carl Sagan:
[He] caused a special drill to be
constructed, which, he hoped, would remove samples from the interior of the
meteorite without contaminating them with microorganisms from outside. Using
sterile techniques, Pasteur inoculated an organic medium to search for growth
of any indigenous microorganisms which the meteorite interior might contain.
The results were negative, and have relevance today: Pasteur extracted his
sample shortly after the fall of the meteorite, and was, of course, a very
careful experimentalist.
The possibility
of biological remains in the Orgueil stone resurfaced, however, a century
later. At a meeting of the New York Academy of Sciences in March 1961,
Bartholomew Nagy and Douglas J. Hennessy of the Department of Chemistry at
Fordham University's Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in the Bronx, and
Warren G. Meinschein, a petroleum chemist at the Esso Research and Engineering
Company in Linden, New Jersey, announced that they had found in a sample of the
meteorite "paraffinoid hydrocarbons," similar in type and
distribution to those occurring in animal products such as butter.
From this, they concluded that "biogenic processes occur and that living
forms exist in regions of the universe beyond the earth." More remarkably,
Nagy and George Claus, a microbiologist at New York University Medical Center,
claimed shortly after that samples from the Orgueil and Ivuna meteorites contained "organized elements"
including structures "resembling fossil algae." A
controversy ensued in which a minority of scientists, including J. D. Bernal, supported the microfossil theory,
while most, including Philip Morrison and Harold Urey were skeptical. Urey did, however,
concede that it was possible the Orgueil and Ivuna microstructures were
evidence for biogenic activity and that, if so, these meteorites may have come
from the Moon which "became contaminated temporarily with water and
life-forms from Earth early in its history." By 1975, Nagy
himself had come to regard the biological interpretation as a "remote
possibility."
In 2001, the
results of a new study of material from the Orgueil carried out by a team from
the Scripps Institution of Oceanography in California, the Leiden Observatory
in the Netherlands, and the NASA Ames Research Center, were published.
This study used sophisticated techniques and instruments aimed at detecting
trace levels of amino acids. After obtaining a pristine piece
of the interior of Orgueil, the researchers found that it contained a
relatively simple mixture of amino acids, consisting primarily of glycine and beta-alanine. They also analyzed the sample's
carbon isotope concentration and found that the amino acids were not derived
from Earthly contamination but instead were almost certainly synthesized
chemically in space. The research team then compared their results with three
other meteorites: Murchison and Murray, which have been studied
extensively, and Ivuna, a meteorite that fell in Tanzania, Africa, in 1938,
that had not been analyzed for amino acids. The team broke the meteorites down
into two classes. The Murchison and Murray meteorites were placed in a category
containing a complex mix of amino acids made up of more than 70 different types
of amino acids. Orgueil and Ivuna, however, were categorized with a much
simpler composition made up primarily of just two amino acids. Based on the
unique amino acid composition within Orgueil, the researchers were able to
deduce information about the meteorite's past. Murchison and Murray are widely
believed to be pieces of an asteroid, as are virtually all meteorites
scientists have studied. However the paper suggests Orgueil and Ivuna show
evidence that they are likely derived from a comet. The amino acid signatures within
Orgueil and Ivuna suggest that these compounds were likely synthesized from
components such as hydrogen cyanide, which have been recently observed
in the comets Hale-Bopp and Hyakutake. This suggests that
the organic material in Orgueil and Ivuna is the product of reactions that once
took place in the nucleus of a comet, which, if true, would make these meteorites
the first to be identified as having come from a cometary nucleus and add to
the evidence that the amino acids that helped generate life on Earth may have
been delivered by meteorites that were derived from the remnants of comets.
In 2004, the possibility of fossilized biological remains in Orgueil was raised
again by Richard Hoover of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC). At the "Instruments, Methods, and Missions for Astrobiology
VIII" (Conference 5555) at SPIE's International Symposium on Optical
Science and Technology held in Denver, Colorado, August 2-3, 2004, Hoover
showed images from a freshly fractured specimen of Orgueil taken in July 2004
using the Environmental- and Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy at
MSFC in Huntsville, Alabama. These pictures appeared to show forms in the
meteorite that closely resemble mats of known terrestrial fossilized cyanobacteria such as Phormidium tenuissimum.
Interestingly, on Earth, such cyanobacteria form their mats only underwater on
surfaces exposed to sunlight. However, the specimen of Orgueil studied by
Hoover has not been submerged since its arrival on Earth (it would have
dissolved), nor was its interior open and exposed to sunlight on Earth before
now. Furthermore, the putative fossils would not represent isolated single
cells, but whole ecologies. The implication is that they must have grown on the
meteorite's parent body before it fell. However, as in the case of other claims
regarding extraterrestrial fossils aboard meteorites, this new piece of
evidence is unlikely to be readily accepted by the scientific establishment
until it can be rigorously shown that (a) the remains admit no non-biological
interpretation, and (b) the possibility of terrestrial contamination can be
absolutely ruled out.


